Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42146156›Full record

ReviewACS omega2026

Molecular and Computational Basis of Taste Perception: A Review toward the "Digital Language of Taste".

Mariia S Ashikhmina, Kunal Dutta, Saadiallakh Normatov, Vladislav S Filozop, Mikhail O Volodarskiy, Olga Volkova, Sviatlana A Ulasevich, Ekaterina V Skorb

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACS omega, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mariia S AshikhminaInfochemistry Scientific Center, ITMO University, 9 Lomonosova Street, St. Petersburg 191002, Russia.
Kunal DuttaInfochemistry Scientific Center, ITMO University, 9 Lomonosova Street, St. Petersburg 191002, Russia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0818-8787
Saadiallakh NormatovInfochemistry Scientific Center, ITMO University, 9 Lomonosova Street, St. Petersburg 191002, Russia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-4834-7713
Vladislav S FilozopInfochemistry Scientific Center, ITMO University, 9 Lomonosova Street, St. Petersburg 191002, Russia.
Mikhail O VolodarskiyInfochemistry Scientific Center, ITMO University, 9 Lomonosova Street, St. Petersburg 191002, Russia.
Olga VolkovaInfochemistry Scientific Center, ITMO University, 9 Lomonosova Street, St. Petersburg 191002, Russia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5812-6162
Sviatlana A UlasevichInfochemistry Scientific Center, ITMO University, 9 Lomonosova Street, St. Petersburg 191002, Russia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1753-911X
Ekaterina V SkorbInfochemistry Scientific Center, ITMO University, 9 Lomonosova Street, St. Petersburg 191002, Russia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0888-1693

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTaste is a multisensory individualized perception. The variability of genetic and physiological factors and the lack of standardized or detailed experimental protocols for research on taste perception create many methodological difficulties in studies. Recent advances in computational chemistry, molecular modeling, and machine learning (ML) provide new avenues to model taste mechanisms, predict taste profiles, and design novel taste compounds, particularly focusing on G-protein-coupled receptors and ion channels.

resultsThis review synthesizes current computational approaches to taste research, including molecular docking, molecular dynamics (MD), and ML. It highlights taste receptors' structural and functional modeling across all primary modalitiessweet, bitter, umami, salty, and sour. Specific focus is given to the challenges of modeling salt and sour taste, integrating MD with receptor-ligand interactions, and applying ML algorithms to predict taste characteristics from molecular descriptors. Recent developments in artificial intelligence (AI) models, such as deep learning and transformer architectures, are improving accuracy but still raise questions regarding the interpretability and generalizability of the data.

conclusionsDespite advances in taste perception, significant limitations remain. One of the primary factors is incomplete structural data on taste receptors and problems with modeling the long-time scales of receptor activation. This leads to inadequate models for multisensory integration. Future efforts should prioritize high-resolution receptor modeling, hybrid computational-experimental validation, and the expansion of AI applications to generate receptor-specific compounds. Bridging computational predictions with human subjective experience will be key to advancing digital taste perception.

Identifiers

PMID42146156
PMCPMC13177004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.