ArticleACS omega2026
Assessment of 3D Printed PEG-PCL/nHA Composite Scaffolds for Bone Regeneration.
Article in ACS omega, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- 3D bioprinted coverage-type lung patch for postoperative wound sealing and prevention of pulmonary air leakage.Nanoscale advances · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although bone tissue possesses inherent regenerative capabilities, bone defects exceeding the critical size remain a significant challenge for successful healing. Consequently, developing biodegradable scaffolds with desirable mechanical and biological properties offers a promising alternative to promote bone regeneration. In this study, porous scaffolds composed of a ternary composite based on polyethylene glycol (PEG), polycaprolactone (PCL), and nanohydroxyapatite (nHA) were successfully fabricated for bone tissue engineering using 3D printing technology. The physicochemical properties of the 3D-printed PEG-PCL/nHA scaffolds were systematically investigated. Results demonstrated that increasing the PEG content to 20% significantly enhanced scaffold hydrophilicity, reducing the water contact angle from 80.01 ± 0.51° to 62.46 ± 2.39° (
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.