Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42146142›Full record

ArticleACS omega2026

MnO

Juree Chunjit, Khemika Wannakan, Watcharaphol Paritmongkol, Thitiwut Vongkampang, Wiriya Thongsomboon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Juree ChunjitDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Mahasarakham University, Kantarawichai, Maha Sarakham 44150, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-9675-1508
Khemika WannakanDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, School of Molecular Science and Engineering, Vidyasirimedhi Institute of Science and Technology (VISTEC), Rayong 21210, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-2668-1054
Watcharaphol ParitmongkolDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, School of Molecular Science and Engineering, Vidyasirimedhi Institute of Science and Technology (VISTEC), Rayong 21210, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1638-6828
Thitiwut VongkampangDepartment of Biotechnology, Faculty of Technology, Mahasarakham University, Kantarawichai, Maha Sarakham 44150, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7328-410X
Wiriya ThongsomboonDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Mahasarakham University, Kantarawichai, Maha Sarakham 44150, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9359-6119

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oil contamination in aquatic environments remains a persistent challenge, motivating the development of oil-water separation materials that are efficient, low-cost, and environmentally friendly. In this study, manganese dioxide-modified bacterial cellulose (MBC) was developed and evaluated as a bio-based coating for oil-water separation. Bacterial cellulose (BC) was biosynthesized by

Identifiers

PMID42146142
PMCPMC13176996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.