ArticleLaryngoscope investigative otolaryngology2026
Effect of Malocclusion on Response to Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation for Obstructive Sleep Apnea.
Article in Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effect of Malocclusion on Response to Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation for Obstructive Sleep Apnea.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Variations in craniofacial anatomy have been associated with the development of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and may impact the response to medical and surgical therapies. This study aims to evaluate the effect of malocclusion on the clinical response to hypoglossal nerve stimulator (HNS) therapy. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study evaluating patients with OSA who underwent HNS placement between May 2017 and December 2022. Occlusion was determined using Angle's Classification Criteria, and outcome measures including preoperative and postoperative Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI), lowest O2 saturation (SpO2), and Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) scores were analyzed. Two cohorts were created by grouping patients with normal occlusion and those with class II or class III malocclusion. Results: Of the 64 patients included in the study, 49 had normal occlusion and 15 had malocclusion. There was no significant difference in age, BMI, or pre-operative AHI between groups. The median AHI in those with normal occlusion was significantly reduced with HNS therapy, going from 35.9 to 8.2 ( Conclusion: This study suggests patients with malocclusion may experience diminished efficacy to HNS therapy. This information may help identify individuals who are less likely to benefit from HNS therapy or who may require alternative (maxillomandibular advancement) or combination therapy (HNS with oral appliance). Level of Evidence: 3.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.