ReviewLaryngoscope investigative otolaryngology2026
Patient Perceptions and Type 1 Delay in Head and Neck Cancer: A Scoping Review of High- and Low-/Middle-Income Countries.
Review in Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To identify and compare how patient perceptions contribute to Type 1 Delays, defined as delays in deciding to seek care, among individuals with head and neck cancer (HNC) in high-income countries (HICs) and low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Methods: We conducted a scoping review and systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Scopus from inception through November 20, 2023. Eligible studies included patients with HNC in HICs or LMICs who reported patient perceptions contributing to Type 1 Delays. Data extraction was performed in duplicate, and barriers were categorized thematically. Fisher's exact test was used to compare the frequency of reported barriers between HIC and LMIC studies. Results: Seventeen studies met inclusion criteria, of which 64.7% ( Conclusion: Type 1 Delays in HNC are common across both HICs and LMICs, with overlapping and region-specific contributors. Tailored interventions, such as patient education, stigma reduction, and improved access to diagnostic services, may promote earlier detection and improve global HNC outcomes. Level of Evidence: 3.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.