ReviewJGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology2026
Critical Review: The Past, Present, and Future of Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth (SIBO).
Review in JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Do Multi-Omics Approaches Improve the Diagnosis of Microbial Overgrowth Syndromes?Current gastroenterology reports · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) has evolved from a severe debilitating illness to a clinical spectrum associated with abnormalities of microbial populations in the small intestine. It is best described as a pathophysiological state that may contribute to symptoms or other pathology in a wide range of gastrointestinal conditions that include disorders of gut-brain interaction, inflammatory bowel disease, and chronic liver disease. The controversy surrounding SIBO largely rests on diagnostic limitations of currently widely used diagnostic tests. The gold standard test of bacterial culture of proximal small intestinal fluid will miss the majority of bacteria, has severe methodological limitations, and is clinically uncommonly used. Breath-hydrogen testing after oral glucose or lactulose ingestion is associated with falsely positive and negative results, due largely to the inability to accurately define where in the gastrointestinal tract the hydrogen is being generated. Such performance characteristics raise concerns regarding its application to clinical decision-making in the individual patient. Therapies such as antibiotics can normalize breath test findings and ameliorate symptoms, but whether this is due to an action on the small intestinal microbiota is uncertain. It is proposed that conceptual modifications that include the assessment of the mucosa-associated microbiota in biopsies obtained with minimal contamination, molecular and functional characterization of the microbiota, rather than purely culture-based density of bacteria, and expansion of the definition of SIBO to small intestinal dysbiosis will facilitate more precision and resolve the controversial place of SIBO in clinical practice.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.