Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42146105›Full record

ReviewJGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology2026

Critical Review: The Past, Present, and Future of Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth (SIBO).

Ayesha Shah, Gerald Holtmann, Peter R Gibson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ayesha ShahFaculty of Health, Medicine and Behavioural Sciences The University of Queensland Brisbane Queensland Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0710-1691
Gerald HoltmannFaculty of Health, Medicine and Behavioural Sciences The University of Queensland Brisbane Queensland Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0206-2358
Peter R GibsonDepartment of Gastroenterology School of Translational Medicine, Monash University Melbourne Victoria Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9108-1712

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) has evolved from a severe debilitating illness to a clinical spectrum associated with abnormalities of microbial populations in the small intestine. It is best described as a pathophysiological state that may contribute to symptoms or other pathology in a wide range of gastrointestinal conditions that include disorders of gut-brain interaction, inflammatory bowel disease, and chronic liver disease. The controversy surrounding SIBO largely rests on diagnostic limitations of currently widely used diagnostic tests. The gold standard test of bacterial culture of proximal small intestinal fluid will miss the majority of bacteria, has severe methodological limitations, and is clinically uncommonly used. Breath-hydrogen testing after oral glucose or lactulose ingestion is associated with falsely positive and negative results, due largely to the inability to accurately define where in the gastrointestinal tract the hydrogen is being generated. Such performance characteristics raise concerns regarding its application to clinical decision-making in the individual patient. Therapies such as antibiotics can normalize breath test findings and ameliorate symptoms, but whether this is due to an action on the small intestinal microbiota is uncertain. It is proposed that conceptual modifications that include the assessment of the mucosa-associated microbiota in biopsies obtained with minimal contamination, molecular and functional characterization of the microbiota, rather than purely culture-based density of bacteria, and expansion of the definition of SIBO to small intestinal dysbiosis will facilitate more precision and resolve the controversial place of SIBO in clinical practice.

Identifiers

PMID42146105
PMCPMC13179449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.