Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42146103›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2026

Unusual case of

Lingying Fan, Yiping Chen

Abstract readReviewCase Reports
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lingying FanDepartment of Clinical Lab, West China School of Public Health and West China Fourth Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Yiping ChenDepartment of Clinical Lab, West China School of Public Health and West China Fourth Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Methods: The isolate was identified using the VITEK 2-Compact system, matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS), and 16S ribosomal ribonucleic acid (16S rRNA) sequencing. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing against 24 antibiotics was performed using the VITEK 2 system according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) M100 (Ed33) guidelines. Resistance genes were detected by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and sequencing. The impact of pH (5.5-8.5) on antibiotic activity was assessed using disk diffusion. Results: The isolate showed 100% sequence identity with Conclusion:

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsDrug Resistance, BacterialFlavobacteriaceaeFlavobacteriaceae InfectionsStomach NeoplasmsAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalDNA, BacterialDNA, RibosomalHumansHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationMaleMiceMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMiddle AgedMinocyclineAnti-Bacterial AgentsDNA, BacterialDNA, RibosomalMinocyclineRNA, Ribosomal, 16Santibiotic resistance geneantibiotic susceptibility testingmultidrug resistanceMyroides odoratimimuspH valueurinary tract infection

Identifiers

PMID42146103
PMCPMC13171834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.