ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2026
Effects of enrichment removal on cognitive judgement bias of mice: a comparison of two paradigms.
Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cognitive judgement bias (CJB) tests have become indispensable for assessing animal emotions. However, the methodology can vary profoundly. In mice, for example, approaches based on vision, spatial orientation and olfaction have all been used. Yet, the impact of such differences for test outcomes remains largely unexplored. Therefore, we aimed to assess the role of methodological variations for CJB test results by applying two different paradigms for mice: one using visual cues displayed on a touchscreen and another using spatial cues in form of different tunnel lengths. Mice were trained in either paradigm. Upon successful training, the enrichment was removed from their cages to induce differences in affective state. Thereafter, animals were tested for their CJB. Anxiety-like behaviour and faecal corticosterone metabolites (FCMs) served as additional indicators of affective state. Against our expectations, we did not detect effects of enrichment removal on CJB in any paradigm. Likewise, no effects on anxiety-like behaviour were found. By trend, animals showed increased FCMs after enrichment removal. We discuss potential reasons for these findings, focusing on the possibility that the enrichment removal effect might have been too weak. Overall, the influence of methodological characteristics such as cue modality on CJB test results remains an important focus for future studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.