Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42145996›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in sociology2026

Government service delivery and citizen satisfaction in Gauteng, South Africa.

Godswill Nwabuisi Osuafor, Salmon Likoko, Monica Ewomazino Akokuwebe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in sociology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Godswill Nwabuisi OsuaforDepartment of Social Sciences, Faculty of Humanities, Social Sciences & Law, Walter Sisulu University, Mthatha, South Africa.
Salmon LikokoDemography and Population Studies, School of Social Sciences, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Monica Ewomazino AkokuwebeSAMRC/Wits Ageing African Adult Research Unit, Department of Paediatrics, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Government service delivery is a critical determinant of citizen trust and satisfaction in South Africa, where inequalities and governance challenges shape perceptions of state performance. Gauteng, the country's most populous and economically dynamic province, provides a revealing case for examining how socio-demographic factors, service experiences, and institutional trust influence satisfaction with provincial, municipal, and ward-level governance. This study examines the patterns of satisfaction and dissatisfaction across tiers of government, highlighting the role of service quality, civic participation, and leadership credibility in shaping confidence. Method: Data were drawn from Rounds 5 (2017/18), 6 (2020/21), and 7 (2023/24) of the GCRO QoL Survey, a regionally representative study conducted biennially in Gauteng Province. The analytic sample comprised 9,946 respondents aged 18 years and above for each governance level: provincial government, local municipality, and ward councillor. Respondents were categorised into satisfied and dissatisfied groups. Analyses employed descriptive statistics, bivariate tests, and logistic regression to identify predictors of satisfaction. Results: Socio-demographic, civic, and perceptual factors significantly predicted satisfaction across governance tiers. Older adults, particularly those aged 60+, reported higher satisfaction, while younger cohorts were consistently more dissatisfied. Population group differences were notable: White respondents expressed substantially higher satisfaction at municipal (OR = 1.67) and ward levels (OR = 4.28), with Indian/Asian respondents also more satisfied at the ward level (OR = 2.09). Education had mixed effects: it reduced provincial satisfaction but increased it at municipal and ward levels. Employment status mattered locally, with unemployed individuals reporting lower satisfaction. Civic engagement, including voter registration and awareness of Batho Pele principles, increased the odds of satisfaction. In contrast, crime victimisation, bribery, and neighbourhood protests reduced service quality; however, satisfaction, particularly in sanitation and healthcare, strongly improved. Conclusion: The study reveals widespread dissatisfaction with government performance in Gauteng, intensified during and after COVID-19, particularly at provincial and municipal levels, with modest recovery at the ward level. Distrust in leadership emerged as the most potent negative predictor across all tiers. These findings underscore the need for institutional reform, equitable service delivery, stronger accountability, and participatory governance to rebuild trust and enhance citizen satisfaction in South Africa.

Indexed as

Batho Pele principlescitizen satisfactionGautenggovernment service deliveryinstitutional trustsocio-demographic factorsSouth Africa

Identifiers

PMID42145996
PMCPMC13171358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.