Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42145959›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2026

Resource potential and essential oil composition of

Zhuldyz Salmukhanbetova, Zhanat Karzhaubekova, Liliya Dimeyeva, Nadezhda Gemejiyeva

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zhuldyz SalmukhanbetovaInstitute of Botany and Phytointroduction, Almaty, Kazakhstan.
Zhanat KarzhaubekovaInstitute of Botany and Phytointroduction, Almaty, Kazakhstan.
Liliya DimeyevaInstitute of Botany and Phytointroduction, Almaty, Kazakhstan.
Nadezhda GemejiyevaInstitute of Botany and Phytointroduction, Almaty, Kazakhstan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Communities dominated by Methods: Classical geobotanical methods were used to describe each site and its resource objects. The yield was determined using two basic methods: clipping and model bushes. Based on the obtained yield data, the operational stock and the volume of possible annual processed air-dried raw material were calculated, taking into account a four-year recovery period. Essential oil was isolated from the air-dried aerial parts of Results and Conclusion: The assessment of

Indexed as

ArtemisiaOils, VolatileGas Chromatography-Mass SpectrometryPlant Components, AerialOils, VolatileArtemisia arenariaEssential oil constituentsNorthern Aral Sea RegionOperational stockResource potentialYield

Identifiers

PMID42145959
PMCPMC13179741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.