ArticlePeerJ2026
Reliability, factor structure, and criterion validity: testing the problematic social media use scale in Chinese college students.
Article in PeerJ, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Despite the increasing prevalence of problematic use of social media (PUSM) in the general population and in college students, there remains no fully agreed-upon clinical definition or assessment tool to identify and characterize PUSM. Caplan's cognitive-behavioral model of generalized problematic use of the internet may provide a conceptual basis for understanding PUSM. Methods: The present study aimed to test the psychometric properties of Caplan's model in the context of PUSM among Chinese college students. The Chinese version of the Problematic Social Media Use Scale (PSMUS, including five subscales: preference for online social interaction (POSI), mood regulation, cognitive preoccupation, compulsive use, and negative outcomes) was administered to Chinese college students. Results: Data from 788 students (mean age = 20.92 ± 2.74 years, 23.52% male) were analyzed. Confirmatory factor analysis supported the feasibility of Caplan's model in the context of PUSM. Structural equation modeling revealed that POSI was a key factor which directly/indirectly ( Conclusion: The results support the adequate psychometric properties of the PSMUS in Chinese college students, thereby substantiating its utility in assessing PUSM in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.