Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42145946›Full record

ArticleGates open research2026

A Culturally Grounded Method for Dialogue Between Indigenous Peoples and Researchers on Emerging Technologies: Lessons from the Gene Drive Context.

Neida Delia Andi Arimuya, Federica Bernardini, Pedro Jose Cabrera Andi, Gladman Chibememe, Florina Lopez Miro, Lucy Mulenkei, Aisatou Musa, Faith Nataya, Fabio Niespolo, Tony Nolan and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gates open research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Neida Delia Andi ArimuyaIndigena Kichwa de la Amazonia Ecuatoriana, Amazonia, Ecuador.
Federica BernardiniImperial College London Department of Life Sciences, London, England, UK.
Pedro Jose Cabrera AndiForo Internacional Indigena sobre Biodiversidad, FIIB, Quito, Ecuador.
Gladman ChibememeChinhoyi University of Technology, Chinhoyi, Mashonaland West Province, Zimbabwe.
Florina Lopez MiroForo Internacional Indigena sobre Biodiversidad, FIIB, Quito, Ecuador.
Lucy MulenkeiIndigenous Information Network, Nairobi, Kenya.
Aisatou MusaAnura Ntabang woman CIG, Ntahbang, Cameroon.
Faith NatayaIndigenous Information Network, Nairobi, Kenya.
Fabio NiespoloEmerging Ag, Manitoba, Canada.
Tony NolanLiverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, England, UK.
Samantha O'LoughlinImperial College London Department of Life Sciences, London, England, UK.
Kamal Kumar RaiNepal Indigenous Forum for Biodiversity, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Ndiaga SallENDA Santé Sénégal, M'bour, Senegal.
Brian TarimoIfakara Health Institute, Ifakara, Morogoro Region, Tanzania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8097-8310
Jose Rafael Teran MaiguaForo Internacional Indigena sobre Biodiversidad, FIIB, Quito, Ecuador.
María Yolanda Teran MaiguaForo Internacional Indigena sobre Biodiversidad, FIIB, Quito, Ecuador.
Delphine ThizyDelphine Thizy Consulting, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6325-8138
Carolina TorresCharles Darwin Foundation, Galapagos, Ecuador.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper presents a participatory method for conducing a collaborative and culturally appropriate dialogue process between gene drive researchers and Indigenous Peoples and local communities. Coordinated by the Outreach Network for Gene Drive Research and representatives of the International Indigenous Forum on Biodiversity (IIFB), this dialogue aimed to build trust and facilitate mutual understanding and create a safe space for sharing traditional knowledge, rather than to reach decisions on the research or implementation of gene drive technology. Over a three-year period, the dialogue evolved through multiple formats, recognising the specific needs to establish a meaningful and culturally appropriate dialogue between these two groups, while ensuring that Indigenous Peoples and local communities could share their traditional knowledge, traditions and innovations in a safe and trusted environment. The method integrates key engagement principles - such as good faith, reciprocity, inclusivity, and respect for Indigenous Peoples and local communities' knowledge systems - and describes how they were operationalised in practice. It provides a concrete example of applied engagement methodology in the context of gene drive and explores how these principles have influenced the dialogue's format and the journey of both groups throughout this process, while also sharing some of the challenges they encountered. This is not a theoretical review, but a joint account from practitioners from diverse backgrounds and interests, on how engagement methods can be implemented in real-world settings. The approach offers practical insights for designing sustained and scalable engagement strategies between scientists and Indigenous Peoples on complex and emerging science topics.

Indexed as

Gene Drive TechnologyIndigenous PeoplesResearch PersonnelHumansbiotechnologyconvention on biological diversitygene drivegenetic approachesindigenous peoplemalariamulti-stakeholder dialogueparticipatory methodstakeholder engagementsynthetic biologytraditional knowledge

Identifiers

PMID42145946
PMCPMC13176445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.