ArticleFrontiers in global women's health2026
Evaluating content validity for a culturally relevant wellness scale for women: the HER-WELL scale.
Article in Frontiers in global women's health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Toward the HER-WELL Framework: A Qualitative Mind-Map Study of Wellness Dimensions Among Women in Saudi Arabia.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Article
- Construct validation of HER-WELL: a bifactor exploratory structural equation modeling evaluation of an eight-domain wellness scale for women.Frontiers in global women's health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Wellness encompasses multiple dimensions that vary across populations, particularly among Saudi women, whose experiences are shaped by cultural, social, and religious factors. These factors shape the way wellness is perceived, pursued, and preserved. Despite growing attention to women's health, existing wellness scales often lack cultural relevance and gender sensitivity. In response, this study centers on assessing face and content validity as an initial validation step toward developing a culturally relevant wellness scale specifically for Saudi women, grounded in empirical evidence and rooted in their lived experiences. Methods: The wellness concepts and item pool were developed from a previous qualitative phase and a systematic review, which together identified eight core wellness dimensions. Face and content validity were assessed using a mixed-methods approach that combined qualitative and quantitative techniques. Results: A panel of multidisciplinary experts reviewed the initial pool of 71 items for clarity, relevance, and necessity. Based on their feedback, the scale was refined to 60 items covering the eight core wellness dimensions. These content-validity results provide the conceptual and cultural foundation for the instrument. Discussion: These content-validity results provide the conceptual and cultural foundation for the instrument and serve as a necessary starting point for future psychometric testing (e.g., CFA, PLS-SEM). Moreover, the mixed-methods validation approach used in this study provides a practical model for future researchers seeking to develop and validate measurement tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.