ArticleNeuro-oncology advances
Real-world mortality and the effect of comorbidities on survival in glioblastoma: A database study using computed phenotypes for rapid, reliable patient identification.
Article in Neuro-oncology advances. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Glioblastoma (GBM) continues to have poor prognosis with minimal improvement since the introduction of the Stupp protocol. While clinical data are often homogenous and not generalizable, real-world data can be used to identify more specific risk factors for poor outcomes. Methods: Utilizing our proprietary computerized phenotype, we identified adult GBM patients at the University of Florida (UF) and the OneFlorida+ CRN database from 2011 to 2021. The chi-square test was used to compare demographic variables between the 2 groups. Additionally, the effect of medical comorbidities and the Charlson Comorbidity Index on overall survival was evaluated. Results: A total of 380 and 1630 GBM patients were identified from UF and OneFlorida+, respectively. UF patients were older, with a lower percentage of minority races. Patients with seizures, hypertension, and dementia had the longest median survival, while those with liver disease and diabetes had the lowest median survival. Older age at diagnosis, presenting with paraplegia or hemiplegia, diabetes, liver disease, and hyperlipidemia were all found to be significant predictors of mortality on multivariate Cox analysis. Conclusion: An estimated 20% of GBM patients participate in clinical trials, limiting the generalizability of results. It is imperative to continue to work towards obtaining high-volume real-world data to improve our understanding of this devastating condition. Here, we confirm that GBM cohorts can be identified in large databases and, using this real-world data, identified several comorbidities that confer worse or better survival times for patients with GBM. This data can be used to improve patient stratification and counseling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.