ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2026
Exploring EMG Biofeedback in Core Training - Bosu Ball vs Swiss Ball Efficacy for Collegiate Students with Mechanical Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Given the high prevalence of low back pain in this demographic group, effective management strategies are essential. This study aimed to compare the effects of EMG biofeedback-assisted core training using Bosu versus Swiss balls on mechanical low back pain in collegiate students. Methods: A randomized controlled trial was implemented with 36 participants aged 18-25, randomly assigned to either the Bosu or Swiss ball group. Over four weeks, both groups engaged in specific core strengthening exercises three times a week. Pain intensity, core strength, and functional ability were assessed using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale, Oswestry Disability Index, and EMG analysis, respectively. Results: Both groups demonstrated significant improvements in pain, functional disability, core strength, and muscle activation following the intervention (p < 0.05). No statistically significant differences were observed between the Bosu ball and Swiss ball groups in the primary outcome measures, however, some enhancements were noted in range of motion, muscle activation and functional disability in the Bosu ball group. Conclusion: EMG biofeedback-assisted core training with Bosu balls is more effective than Swiss balls in managing mechanical low back pain in collegiate students. These findings suggest that incorporating Bosu ball exercises can enhance therapeutic outcomes, underscoring the need for tailored rehabilitation strategies to improve quality of life for young adults suffering from low back pain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.