ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
A study of the effectiveness of the CBL combined with SP in the standardized training of general medicine residents.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The standardized training of general practitioners is a crucial component of post-graduation medical education and a strategic initiative in China's healthcare workforce planning. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of an innovative teaching model- Case-Based Learning (CBL) combined with Standardized Patient (SP)-in the standardized training of general practice residents, with the goal of informing the development of general practitioner training and supporting national strategic health workforce policies. Methods: A total of 48 resident trainees participating in general practice standardized training in the First People's Hospital of Huzhou City were randomly assigned to the CBL combined SP (CBL-SP) group under the CBL-SP model or the LBL group with traditional teaching. Assessments included knowledge tests, clinical consultation skills, evaluations of teaching satisfaction, conducted both before and after the general rotation were used to evaluate the teaching effects of the two groups. Results: Both groups demonstrated significant improvements in clinical competence scores. Comparing the general practice clinical competence of both groups before and after instruction, we found that the CBL-SP group achieved significantly greater improvements than the LBL group across stimulation of learning interest, subjective initiative in learning, knowledge extension ability, improvement in clinical reasoning skills, ability to guide healthy lifestyles, teamwork awareness, willingness to continue this teaching approach, and teaching satisfaction ( Conclusion: The CBL combined with SP demonstrates significant effectiveness in the standardized training of general practice residents. This innovative approach not only enhances learning outcomes and trainee satisfaction but also holds promise for supporting the strategic scaling of high-quality GP training across China, thereby contributing to the nation's primary care workforce development goals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.