ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Undergraduate medical research in the West Bank, Palestine: a cross-sectional analysis of student knowledge, attitudes, barriers, and engagement across five universities.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Medical research integration within undergraduate education is critical for developing scientifically literate physicians capable of evidence-based practice. However, profound disparities persist globally, particularly in low- and middle-income countries where students encounter substantial barriers including inadequate infrastructure, limited funding, and insufficient mentorship. Palestinian medical students navigate additional unique challenges, including political instability, movement restrictions, and frequent academic disruptions. This study provides a comprehensive multi-institutional assessment of research knowledge, attitudes, barriers, and engagement among Palestinian medical students in the West Bank. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 625 undergraduate medical students (second to sixth year) from five Palestinian universities. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire adapted from previously validated instruments in the literature, comprising sections assessing demographics, research knowledge, attitudes, perceived barriers, and research practices. All data were analyzed using the IBM SPSS statistical package (version 25). Results: Nearly half of students (49.1%) demonstrated poor research knowledge, 33% fair knowledge, and only 17.9% satisfactory knowledge. Despite these deficits, students showed remarkably positive attitudes toward research (median: 70/93) and recognized its professional value (median: 25/27). Research participation was moderate (45.9%), but scholarly output remained limited, with 74.9% never publishing any work. Students reported high barrier burden (median: 75/96), with primary obstacles including lack of funding (64%), insufficient time (62.1%), limited statistical knowledge (60.5%), and universities prioritizing education over research (60.5%). Research methodology training, parental education, university affiliation, and academic year significantly influenced knowledge scores and participation rates. Conclusion: Palestinian medical students recognize research value but face substantial knowledge gaps and systemic barriers that limit engagement and scholarly dissemination. Addressing these challenges requires longitudinal curriculum integration, structured mentorship programs, dedicated research funding, and institutional support to develop a research-literate healthcare workforce capable of addressing local and regional health challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.