ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Training gaps and needs of pre-hospital emergency staff in Chengdu: a city-wide cross-sectional study.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To understand the basic situation, training status, and training needs of pre-hospital emergency personnel in Chengdu, and to provide a scientific basis for developing standardized and unified pre-hospital training content and methods in Chengdu, with the aim of improving the quality of the pre-hospital emergency talent pool. Methods: An anonymous questionnaire survey was conducted. Questionnaires were distributed to 196 120-network hospitals in Chengdu, covering basic information, training status, and training needs. Data analysis was performed using Excel and SPSS 26.0. Results: A total of 4,209 pre-hospital emergency personnel participated in the survey. The main way of acquiring first aid knowledge was in-person training organized by their institutions (93.68%, 3,943 person-times). The main training content attended was practical operations (94.65%, 3,984 person-times). Most personnel participated in first aid-related training less than twice per year (57.23%, 2,409 persons). The most significant factor affecting their participation in training was concern about whether training quality and practical relevance of content could be guaranteed (56.02%, 2,358 person-times). The training method most expected by pre-hospital emergency personnel was practical operation (84.77%, 3,568 person-times), and the most expected training content was environmental injuries (77.17%, 3,248 person-times). There was no significant difference in the ways of acquiring medical first aid knowledge among emergency personnel from hospitals of different levels ( Conclusion: The current first aid training in Chengdu cannot meet the training needs of pre-hospital emergency personnel. Training institutions should fully understand the characteristics of participants and conduct stratified training for pre-hospital emergency personnel from hospitals of different levels, implementing practice-oriented and highly practical training to improve the first aid capabilities of pre-hospital emergency personnel and promote the sustainable development of emergency medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.