SynthesisFrontiers in medicine2026
Effects of various exercise interventions for postpartum stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Exercise therapy is the first-line treatment for postpartum stress urinary incontinence (PSUI); however, the optimal regimen remains unclear. Objective: This study aimed to compare the effects of different exercise modalities on urinary leakage volume, quality of life, and pelvic floor muscle strength in PSUI patients using a network meta-analysis (NMA). Methods: Chinese and English databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from inception to September 2025. Two researchers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias. A network meta-analysis was performed using Stata 16.0, with treatment effects ranked by the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA). The interventions reviewed included pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) alone or combined with biofeedback, electrical stimulation, or vaginal weights, as well as aerobic exercise and traditional exercises. Treatment effects were expressed as standardized mean differences (SMDs) or odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: A total of 49 RCTs involving 5,432 patients were included. SUCRA ranking indicated that PFMT combined with vaginal weights yielded the highest efficacy in reducing objective urinary leakage (1-h pad test, 92.1%; SMD vs. conventional care = 4.10, 95% CI: 0.29 to 7.92). For improving the quality of life, as measured by the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form (ICIQ-SF), PFMT combined with biofeedback and electrical stimulation (SMD = -4.41, 95% CI: -8.31 to -0.52) and aerobic exercise demonstrated superiority. For enhancing pelvic floor muscle strength, PFMT combined with vaginal weights (OR = 3.97, 95% CI: 2.15 to 5.79) and PFMT combined with biofeedback and electrical stimulation (OR = 4.07, 95% CI: 2.14 to 5.99) showed the most pronounced effects compared with conventional care. Conclusion: Among the various interventions, PFMT combined with vaginal weights is the most effective for reducing objective leakage, PFMT combined with biofeedback and electrical stimulation is the most effective for enhancing muscle strength, and aerobic exercise is the most effective for improving quality of life. To further validate these conclusions, large-scale, high-quality RCTs are needed. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD420251249264.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.