ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Exploratory observational study of the association between bacterial L-form detection and intrauterine infection in pregnant women with placenta previa and bleeding.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to conduct an exploratory observational analysis to assess the association between bacterial L-form detection and intrauterine infection in pregnant women with placenta previa and bleeding, and to describe its potential relationship with maternal and fetal outcomes. Methods: A total of 120 patients with placenta previa and bleeding were enrolled and divided into an L-form positive group ( Results: The L-form positive group had higher rates of multiple miscarriages (unadjusted OR = 2.67, 95% CI: 1.10-6.47), uterine cavity procedures (unadjusted OR=2.39, 95% CI: 1.10-5.18), and previous cesarean sections (unadjusted OR = 2.68, 95% CI: 1.07-6.73) than the L-form negative group. This group also showed lower gestational age and birth weight, together with higher rates of neonatal pneumonia (32.5% vs. 7.5%, unadjusted OR = 5.93, 95% CI: 1.67-21.04), chorioamnionitis (35.0% vs. 10.0%, unadjusted OR = 4.85, 95% CI: 1.57-14.95), and neonatal antibiotic use (40.0% vs. 12.5%, unadjusted OR = 4.67, 95% CI: 1.67-13.04). Exploratory susceptibility testing suggested low sensitivity to cell wall-active antibiotics and relatively higher sensitivity to polymyxin, rifampin, protein synthesis inhibitors, and cephalosporins. L-form detection in umbilical cord blood and neonatal peripheral blood was more frequent in the L-form positive group, and bacterial L-form detection showed descriptive correlations with lower gestational age, lower birth weight, pneumonia, neonatal mortality, and more severe chorioamnionitis. Conclusion: In this exploratory observational study, bacterial L-form detection was associated with markers of intrauterine infection in pregnant women with placenta previa and bleeding. These findings should be interpreted cautiously because the analyses were unadjusted and the microbiological workflow remains exploratory.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.