Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42145708›Full record

ArticleBiomedical optics express2026

Impact of the β correction factor on the accuracy of speckle contrast imaging measurements.

Nataliya Makeeva, Markus Ong, Christian Crouzet, Bernard Choi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical optics express, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nataliya MakeevaUniversity of California, Irvine, Beckman Laser Institute and Medical Clinic, Irvine, California, USA.
Markus OngUniversity of California, Irvine, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Irvine, California, USA.
Christian CrouzetUniversity of California, Irvine, Beckman Laser Institute and Medical Clinic, Irvine, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8809-2119
Bernard ChoiUniversity of California, Irvine, Beckman Laser Institute and Medical Clinic, Irvine, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4380-8291

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Laser speckle imaging (LSI) is a non-invasive technique for quantifying superficial blood flow based on speckle contrast analysis. A critical factor influencing blood flow calculations is the β coefficient, which accounts for system-specific parameters such as speckle-to-pixel size ratio and light polarization. While β is often assumed based on the system's settings, this simplification introduces variability and error in flow quantification, limiting reproducibility and cross-system comparisons. In this study, we present a β-correction approach that uses static phantom measurements to empirically determine β and apply it to correct speckle flow index (SFI) values. We validate this method across three experimental conditions (varying detector polarization, speckle-to-pixel size ratios, and different LSI systems) using both in vitro and in vivo data. Our results demonstrate that β-correction significantly reduces intra-system and day-to-day measurement variability and partially improves inter-system consistency, particularly at low flow speeds. This method enhances LSI reliability for longitudinal clinical monitoring within individual systems by reducing day-to-day measurement variability. While β-correction provides partial improvement with lower coefficients of variation for inter-system consistency at low flow speeds, its primary value lies in standardizing repeated measurements over time.

Identifiers

PMID42145708
PMCPMC13178622

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.