ArticleBiomedical optics express2026
Automated montaging and contrast stretching of adaptive optics ophthalmoscope images.
Article in Biomedical optics express, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We present an automated montaging method for distortion-corrected single- and multi-channel adaptive optics ophthalmoscope images. The approach employs a zero-mean normalized weighted cross-correlation (ZNWCC) that enables assigning real-valued pixel weights to account for irregular image boundaries, spatially varying signal-to-noise ratio, and motion of retinal features. An initial sub-pixel pairwise registration using translation, rotation, and, if needed, scaling is refined with a global registration quality metric derived from peak ZNWCC values. The images are montaged through weighted averaging and contrast stretching that equalize mean image brightness and contrast in overlapping regions, compensating for differences in overall illumination, detector offset, and detector gain. A final montage is created by combining the transformed images calculated through a single interpolation to mitigate loss of resolution, and with an optional polynomial field-flattening step to increase contrast throughout the montage. The method is demonstrated on AO retinal image sets from human and mouse eyes.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.