Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42145657›Full record

ReviewAntibody therapeutics2026

Ivonescimab and other anti-programmed death-1/ligand 1 (PD-(L)1)/vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) bispecific antibodies: progress and prospects in cancer therapy.

Cunnan Dong, Xue Wang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Antibody therapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Cunnan DongAkeso Biopharma, Inc., Zhongshan, 528437, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-4810-7129
Xue WangAkeso Biopharma, Inc., Zhongshan, 528437, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In cancer therapy, the synergistic interaction between immunotherapy and anti-angiogenic therapy has been validated by both preclinical and clinical studies, and has laid the foundation for the development of anti-PD-(L)1/VEGF bispecific antibodies. In the HARMONi-2 trial, ivonescimab demonstrated superior efficacy over pembrolizumab for the first time. This milestone may open a new era of immunotherapy with bispecific antibodies replacing anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibodies. Subsequently, the HARMONi-6 trial confirmed that ivonescimab combined with chemotherapy also outperformed tislelizumab plus chemotherapy, adding further evidence. Currently, dozens of anti-PD-(L)1/VEGF bispecific antibodies with distinct molecular structures have entered clinical stages; and only ivonescimab has completed Phase 3 clinical trial validation in multiple clinical trials and obtained approval in China. A growing body of clinical evidence indicates that in immunotherapy-sensitive tumors (e.g. lung cancer), bispecific antibodies have demonstrated superior efficacy compared with monoclonal antibodies. Even in tumors traditionally refractory to immunotherapy (such as colorectal cancer and pancreatic cancer), bispecific antibodies exhibit promising therapeutic effects while maintaining a favorable safety profile. Nevertheless, several issues require further investigation, such as predictive biomarkers and resistance mechanisms. Future investigations surrounding this class of agents are highly anticipated, including anti-PD-(L)1/VEGF bispecific antibodies-based combination therapy in a broader range of tumor types, as well as the development of trispecific antibodies and bispecific antibody-drug conjugates.

Indexed as

anti-PD-(L)1/VEGFbispecific antibodycancer therapyimmunotherapyivonescimab

Identifiers

PMID42145657
PMCPMC13175990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.