ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2026
Enhanced Adverse-Event Detection and Drug-Event Relation Extraction from Clinical Notes.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Adverse drug events (ADEs) are a significant source of preventable patient harm, yet many ADE signals remain buried in free-text clinical notes. Clinical notes often describe adverse events (AEs) in relation to drugs in two ways: whether a drug causes the AE (the AE is an ADE) or a drug is given to treat an AE (it is considered the Reason for drug treatment). In the N2C2 2018 benchmark, ADEs and Reasons are annotated as separate entity types, despite often being similar in both wording and clinical meaning. This shared similarity makes them difficult to distinguish during entity extraction, leading to errors in relation classification. Therefore, we propose a two-stage framework that first detects AEs as a unified event category and then classifies drug-event pairs into Drug-ADE, Drug-Reason, or No-Relation. In the end-to-end evaluation on the N2C2 2018 benchmark, our system achieves F1 scores of 0.93 for Drug-ADE and 0.94 for Drug-Reason, improving over previously reported end-to-end benchmarks of 0.48 for Drug-ADE and 0.59 for Drug-Reason. Overall, these results support a more precise task formulation in which AEs are detected broadly first, and the ADE vs Reason distinction is resolved at the relation layer. Furthermore, they motivate the development of AE-focused datasets annotated independently of drug linkage to enable more reliable end-to-end pharmacovigilance systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.