ReviewFrontiers in psychology2026
Clinical Organizational Science: an integrative framework for structural intervention in complex organizations.
Review in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Organizations frequently fail to sustain transformation despite substantial investment in leadership development, cultural change programs, and structural redesign. Existing frameworks tend to treat organizational stability as passive inertia rather than as an actively and recursively reproduced dynamic state. This paper introduces Clinical Organizational Science (COS), an integrative framework that addresses this gap by specifying the structural mechanisms through which organizational stability is generated and through which durable transformation can be induced. Drawing on complexity science, neuroscience, organizational psychology, and behavioral science, COS proposes a multilevel mechanistic account-the emergence bridge-connecting individual behavioral habituation to organizational-level attractor transition. Three structured intervention techniques are presented-Field Gradient Theory, Loop Conversion Design, and Neural Base Design-each operationalizing a distinct structural mechanism with specified theoretical foundations and failure conditions. Illustrative patterns consistent with the framework's theoretical predictions are discussed across behavioral, relational, and organizational levels, with explicit acknowledgment of their conceptual rather than evidentiary status. An ethics framework governing neuroscience-informed organizational intervention is also proposed. COS offers a theoretically grounded conceptual framework that repositions organizational transformation from a behavioral change project to a structural intervention problem, accompanied by testable propositions and directions for independent empirical investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.