ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Social media social comparison orientation and physical self-efficacy among Chinese college students: sequential mediation via body shame and body appreciation.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study examined the association between social media social comparison orientation and physical self-efficacy among Chinese college students, and tested whether body shame and body appreciation mediated this association independently and sequentially. Methods: A cross-sectional online survey was conducted among 3,401 undergraduate students from 12 universities in Shandong Province, China. Using convenience sampling, participants were recruited through university-affiliated online channels, including class communication groups, university social media groups, student organization networks, and learning platforms, with dissemination support from local collaborators. Measures of social media social comparison orientation, body shame, body appreciation, and physical self-efficacy were administered in Chinese. Structural equation modeling and bias-corrected bootstrapping were used to estimate direct and indirect associations. Results: Social media social comparison orientation was negatively associated with physical self-efficacy (β = -0.30) and body appreciation (β = -0.26), and positively associated with body shame (β = 0.32). Body shame was negatively associated with physical self-efficacy (β = -0.19) and body appreciation (β = -0.28), whereas body appreciation was positively associated with physical self-efficacy (β = 0.23; all ps < .001). Bootstrapping indicated a significant total association between social media social comparison orientation and physical self-efficacy [β = -0.441, 95% CI (-0.478, -0.403)], including a significant direct association [β = -0.298, 95% CI (-0.342, -0.253)] and a significant total indirect association [β = -0.143, 95% CI (-0.163, -0.124)]. Specific indirect associations were significant via body shame [β = -0.061, 95% CI (-0.076, -0.049)] and body appreciation [β = -0.061, 95% CI (-0.075, -0.048)]. The sequential indirect association through body shame and body appreciation was also significant [β = -0.021, 95% CI (-0.027, -0.016)]. Conclusion: Higher social media social comparison orientation was associated with lower physical self-efficacy among Chinese college students. Body shame and body appreciation were linked to this association both as separate indirect pathways and as a sequential indirect pathway. These findings underscore the importance of body-related self-conscious emotion and positive body image in understanding how social media comparison orientation relates to perceived physical ability in a Chinese college context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.