ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Assessment of disability in the older adults using electronic health record-based data: a machine learning approach.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Global population aging is accelerating, and China faces a significant challenge with "aging before affluent." The disabled older adults population in China is projected to reach 58 million by 2050. Early identification of disability risk is essential for optimizing healthcare resource allocation and improving long-term care systems. Objective: This study aimed to develop and validate machine learning models using comprehensive electronic medical record (EMR) data to predict four distinct levels of disability in older adults inpatients. Methods: Data from 523 patients (age ≥ 60) were retrospectively collected from two tertiary hospitals in Northeast China. Disability was categorized into four levels (A-D) based on the Barthel Index (BI). Feature selection was performed using LASSO regression with 10-fold cross-validation. Six algorithms-Logistic Regression (LOG), Random Forest (RF), Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM), XGBoost, AdaBoost, and Support Vector Machine (SVM)-were evaluated. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) was employed to interpret model decisions. Results: Seventeen critical predictors were identified, including age, appendicular skeletal muscle mass index (ASMI), phase angle, and various inflammatory markers. The LOG and XGBoost models demonstrated the best performance (AUC = 0.83; Accuracy = 0.91). Ten-fold cross-validation confirmed stable model. SHAP analysis indicated that neurological comorbidities, muscle mass indicators, and nutritional-inflammatory status were the primary drivers of disability risk. Conclusion: EMR-based machine learning models, particularly XGBoost, provide a robust and interpretable tool for early disability risk stratification, supporting clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.