ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Variability in diagnostic and therapeutic decision-making for endodontic-periodontal lesions: evidence from a cross-sectional study.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The endodontic-periodontal lesions (EPLs) are a complex clinical condition whose diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis remain challenging. Therefore, a clear understanding of appropriate diagnostic and therapeutic approaches is essential for optimal treatment planning. This study aimed to evaluate dental practitioners' knowledge of diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for EPLs in Pakistan. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 380 registered dental practitioners in Pakistan using a self-administered questionnaire. Participants included 134 females (35.3%) and 246 males (64.7%), with the majority aged 25 Results: There was a substantial range in the knowledge among participants based on their demographic characteristics and profession. Unadjusted analysis showed that a statistically significant association existed between knowledge levels and independent variables, including age ( Conclusion: Practitioners had better therapeutic knowledge than diagnostic knowledge of EPLs, which indicates an overall above-average degree of awareness of EPLs, with noted gaps in diagnostic accuracy. Focused educational initiatives and evidence-based clinical practice guidelines may help improve practitioner decision-making for diagnosing EPLs as well as optimize the care provided for patients with EPLs, leading to improved patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.