Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42145477›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2026

Rumor propagation dynamic analysis model based on hypergraph integration in public health events.

Mengna Zhang, Xin Zhang, Fuzhao Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mengna ZhangSchool of Management Science and Engineering, Rural Revitalization Industry-Academia-Research-Application Center, Guizhou University of Finance and Economics, Guiyang, China.
Xin ZhangCollege of Public Administration, Guizhou University of Finance and Economics, Guiyang, China.
Fuzhao LiParty and Government Office, Guizhou University of Finance and Economics, Guiyang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During public health emergencies, the spread of online rumors can easily trigger public panic and anxiety, exacerbating their negative social impact. How to precisely regulate the dissemination of rumors in cyberspace under such circumstances, thereby enhancing the efficiency of public opinion management, has become a critical issue urgently needing resolution by both administrators and researchers. The study focuses on accurately describing the propagation patterns of rumor information from its source. Therefore, the study constructs a novel H-SNIR (Hypernetwork-Susceptible-Neglected-Infectious-Recovered) model in a hypernetwork. The model comprehensively considers the psychological differences among individuals during rumor propagation, categorizing rumor spreaders into two types: ordinary spreaders and hesitant spreaders. The H-SNIR model introduces a node for neglected spreaders, making the constructed model more consistent with the real-world rumor propagation process. Additionally, by integrating three key dimensions-user influence, topic popularity, and user interaction-the study thoroughly analyzes how these variables affect the rumor-forwarding mechanism in social networks.

Indexed as

CommunicationInformation DisseminationInternetPublic HealthDigital MediaHumansModels, TheoreticalPublic Opinionhesitant spreadershypernetworkkey dimensionspublic health emergenciesrumor propagation

Identifiers

PMID42145477
PMCPMC13176158

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.