ArticleBioinformation2026
Implementing a manual dashboard for blood center management in under-resourced settings.
Article in Bioinformation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Blood transfusion is vital in healthcare, aiding surgeries, traumatic injuries, and chronic conditions. Enhancements in Transfusion Medicine focus on safe blood products and effective Quality Management Systems (QMS) to minimize transfusion risks. Evaluating key performance indicators (KPIs) is crucial for quality assurance and ongoing improvement in blood transfusion services. Therefore, it is of interest to evaluate a healthcare facility's compliance with NABH standards for blood transfusion services using 11 Key Performance Indicators (KPIs). Findings show Transfusion Transmissible Infections (TTIs) consistently below benchmarks at an average of 2.19%, with all parameters except Syphilis meeting standards. The Adverse Transfusion Reaction Rate (ATRR) averaged 0.36%, indicating robust safety protocols, while blood wastage rates showed significant variation, highlighting the need for better inventory management. Turnaround times for cross-matches met benchmarks, averaging 27.29 minutes for emergencies and delayed transfusions stayed under 15%. Overall, the study highlights areas for improvement, particularly in wastage rates and donor management, underscoring the necessity for ongoing quality assessment and continuous improvement initiatives to enhance patient safety and care quality in transfusion practices. KPI-Dashboard is very helpful in identifying the current lacunae which can be very helpful in improving blood transfusion services. Present study describes a concept of manual dashboard.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.