Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42145442›Full record

ArticleBioinformation2026

Mesiobuccal2 (MB2) canal evaluation for maxillary first molar in Indian sub-population.

Rishu Singh, Aniket Jadhav, Ashwini Gaikwad, Madhura A Jadhav, Mrunal Shinde

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rishu SinghDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Bharati Vidyapeeth deemed to be University Dental College and Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Aniket JadhavDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Bharati Vidyapeeth deemed to be University Dental College and Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Ashwini GaikwadDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Bharati Vidyapeeth deemed to be University Dental College and Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Madhura A JadhavDepartment of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Bharati Vidyapeeth deemed to be University Dental College and hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Mrunal ShindeDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Bharati Vidyapeeth deemed to be University Dental College and Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The success of endodontic treatment relies on the knowledge of root canal anatomy and the ability to access, clean and fill the entire canal system. Therefore, it is of interest to evaluate the prevalence, position and canal arrangement of the MB2 (mesiobuccal 2) canal in 170 maxillary first molars. The MB2 canal was identified in 59.41% of the teeth, with Vertucci Type II arrangement being the most common (69.3%), followed by Type IV (30.7%). The average inter-canal distance between MB1 and MB2 was 1.84 ± 0.41 mm. Spatial analysis showed that the MB2 canal lies in close proximity to MB1, with no significant association between canal configuration and gender (p = 0.583). Thus, we show CBCT's value in detecting complex canal morphology and the need for population-based studies in diverse populations like India to improve endodontic predictability.

Indexed as

Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)Indian populationprevalencesecond mesiobuccalcanal

Identifiers

PMID42145442
PMCPMC13177160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.