ArticleBioinformation2026
Dental implants in rehabilitation for cleft orthognathic: A clinical study.
Article in Bioinformation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Implant-based rehabilitation in patients with cleft lip and palate following orthognathic correction remains challenging due to altered bone quality, scarred soft tissues and concerns regard long-term stability and prosthetic complications. Therefore, it is of interest to evaluate clinically the survival rate of implants and the success rate of prosthetics in patients with clefts who underwent staged rehabilitation post-orthognathic treatment. This took place after standardized monitoring for follow-up and peri-implant conditions. Very high short-term implant survival was noted with complications limited to cases that needed regrafting or those requiring complicated prosthetic contours within the cleft segment. Substantial enhancement in functional recovery and patient-reported satisfaction took place when design considerations for prosthetics gave priority to hygiene access plus management of soft tissue. Implant rehabilitation becomes predictable among appropriately selected patients having cleft-orthognathic conditions when there is integration between surgical planning and prosthodontic implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.