Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42145422›Full record

ArticleBioinformation2026

Esthetic evaluation of immediate implants in the maxillary anterior region.

Sanchari Sinha Roy, Mutthineni Ramesh Babu, Stiti Pragnya, William Thomas, Abhijeet Buragohain, Nisha Chaudhary

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sanchari Sinha RoyDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Institute of Dental Science, Siksha 'O' Anusandhan University, Bhubaneshwar, Odisha, India.
Mutthineni Ramesh BabuDepartment of Periodontics & Implantology, Mamta Dental College, Khammam, Telangana, India.
Stiti PragnyaDepartment of Dentistry, Pandit Raghunath Murmu Medical College and Hospital, Baripada, Odisha, India.
William ThomasDepartment of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Lincoln University College, Petaling Jaya, Selangore, Malaysia.
Abhijeet BuragohainDepartment of Dentistry, Assam Medical College and Hospital, Dibrugarh, Assam, India.
Nisha ChaudharyDepartment of Prosthodontics and Crown & Bridge, Seema Dental College and Hospital, Rishikesh, Uttrakhand, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The esthetic restoration of the maxillary anterior region presents a significant challenge in dental implantology, particularly when using immediate implants. Therefore, it is of interest to evaluate the soft and hard tissue outcomes of immediate implants in the maxillary anterior region over 12 months in 100 participants. Results showed high Pink Esthetic Scores (PES) and White Esthetic Scores (WES), with minimal bone loss and high patient satisfaction. We show the viability of immediate implants for esthetic rehabilitation in the anterior maxilla. Thus, data shows that immediate implants can reliably maintain esthetic outcomes over time, offering an efficient solution for dental restoration.

Indexed as

Anterior maxillabone lossesthetic outcomesimmediate implantpatient satisfaction

Identifiers

PMID42145422
PMCPMC13177127

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.