Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42145417›Full record

ArticleBioinformation2026

Evaluation of post-operative pain after single-sitting pulpectomy using hand versus rotary instrumentation in primary molars.

Anukrati Doneria, Kinjal Shah, Endla Varun Kumar, Devashree Shukla, Neel Gagan, Amish Diwanji, Miral Mehta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Anukrati DoneriaDepartment of Dental Surgery, Sarojini Naidu Medical College, Agra, India.
Kinjal ShahDepartment of Pediatric and preventive dentistry, Manubhai Patel Dental College and Hospital, Vadodara, Gujarat, India.
Endla Varun KumarDepartment of Dentistry, Maharaja's institute of medical sciences, Nellimarla, Vizianagaram, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Devashree ShuklaDepartment of Dentistry, LN Medical College and J K Hospital, Kolar Road, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Neel GaganDepartment of Pediatric and preventive dentistry, Maharaja Ganga Singh Dental College, Sri Ganganagar, Rajasthan, India.
Amish DiwanjiDepartment of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Faculty of Dental Science, Dharmsinh Desai University, Nadiad, India.
Miral MehtaDepartment of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Karnavati School of Dentistry, Karnavati University, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Post-operative pain after single-sitting pulpectomy in primary molars significantly affects children's treatment acceptance and subsequent behaviour. Therefore, it is of interest to compare hand versus rotary instrumentation in 80 children (4-9 years) requiring pulpectomy in mandibular primary molars (n=40 each). Pain was assessed using the Wong-Baker FACES scale at 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours post-treatment, alongside analgesic consumption. Rotary instrumentation showed significantly lower pain scores at 6 hours (1.85±1.12 vs 3.20± 1.45, p<0.001), 12 hours (1.42±0.98 vs 2.65±1.28, p<0.001), and 24 hours (0.78±0.72 vs 1.55±1.08, p< 0.001). Rotary instrumentation reduces post-operative pain compared to hand files, establishing it as the preferred technique for single- visit pulpectomy in pediatric endodontics.

Indexed as

hand instrumentationpediatric dentistrypost-operative painprimary molarsPulpectomyrotary instrumentationsingle-visit endodontics

Identifiers

PMID42145417
PMCPMC13177065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.