ArticleBioinformation2026
Dentinal tubule penetration of a bioceramic sealer after different final irrigants: SEM and CLSM study.
Article in Bioinformation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The extent of bioceramic sealer penetration into dentinal tubules following root canal obturation remains insufficiently validated using combined analyses on the same sample with scanning electron microscopy, confocal laser scanning microscopy and ion nano-complex evaluation. Therefore, it is of interest to investigate the extent of penetration of a bioceramic sealer into dentinal tubules after the use of various final irrigants and evaluated ion nano-complex formation. Mandibular incisor teeth were instrumented, divided into four groups based on the final irrigation protocol and obturated with gutta-percha and a bioceramic sealer tagged with a fluorescent dye (Fluo-3), followed by evaluation using confocal laser scanning microscopy and scanning electron microscopy with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy. Although statistical analysis did not reveal significant differences among the groups, Twin Kleen demonstrated superior performance in multiple comparisons. The HEBP component of Twin Kleen, due to its compatibility with sodium hypochlorite and its ability to reduce debris accumulation and smear layer formation, may contribute to enhanced sealer penetration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.