Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42145396›Full record

ArticleBioinformation2026

Comparing the biological response to immediate versus delayed implants placement in terms of osseointegration and bone quality.

Gurmeet Ahuja, Sapna Pandey, Shreya Gill, Mohit Mahesh Galani, Zameer Pasha, Sooriaprakas Chandrasekaran, Anukriti Kumari

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Gurmeet AhujaDepartment of Dentistry, Royaldente, Gurgaon, Haryana, India.
Sapna PandeyDepartment of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Chandra Dental College and Hospital, Dharsania, Barabanki, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Shreya GillDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, DMD, Virginia, USA.
Mohit Mahesh GalaniDepartment of Dentistry, AIIMS, Rajkot, Gujarat, India.
Zameer PashaDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Durrat Al-Alammi Dental Clinic, Al-Majmaah, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Sooriaprakas ChandrasekaranDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Meenakshi Ammal Dental College and Hospital, Meenakshi Academy of Higher Education and Research (Deemed to be University) Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Anukriti KumariDepartment of Oral Medicine and Radiology, School of Dental Sciences, Sharda University, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The timing of implant placement after tooth extraction plays a critical role in osseointegration, peri-implant healing and bone quality. Therefore, it is of interest to compare the biological responses of immediate versus delayed implant placement on implant stability and bone quality. Hence, a total of 100 participants were divided into two groups, with immediate and delayed implant placements. Thus, we show delayed implants exhibited superior early stability and bone density, but after 6 months, no significant differences were observed.

Indexed as

delayed implantsDental implant placementimmediate implantsosseointegrationperi-implant bone quality

Identifiers

PMID42145396
PMCPMC13177048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.