Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42145379›Full record

ArticleBioinformation2026

Comparative evaluation of remineralisation potential using BioHAP, CPP-ACP and Enamelon on root dentin: An

Rashmi Patil, Rinky Hajong, Aslam Tariq Mohammed, Sruthi Keerthi, Pranoti Lavekar, Dimple Rakhecha, Rubeena Naaz, Md Kafeel Ahmed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Rashmi PatilDepartment of Conservative and Endodontics, P.M.N.M Dental College and Hospital, Bagalkot, Karnataka, India.
Rinky HajongDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Government Dental College and Hospital, Silchar, Assam, India.
Aslam Tariq MohammedDepartment of Orthodontics, Narayana Dental College, Nellore, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Sruthi KeerthiDepartment of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Consultant in Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Pranoti LavekarDepartment of Public Health Dentistry, Private Practitioner, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Dimple RakhechaDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Government Dental College and Hospital, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.
Rubeena NaazPrivate Practitioner, Dental Surgeon, SRK Dental Clinic, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Md Kafeel AhmedDepartment of Periodontology and Implantology, MNR Dental College and Hospital, Sangareddy, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Root caries and cervical dentin hypersensitivity affect older adults with gingival recession, requiring effective remineralisation strategies for root dentin preservation. Therefore, it is of interest to compare remineralisation potential of BioHAP, CPP-ACP and Enamelon on artificially demineralised root dentin from 60 extracted premolars using a 28-day pH cycling protocol. All agents significantly increased microhardness versus control (p<0.001), with BioHAP achieving superior recovery at 68.42±7.83% compared to other groups. SEM analysis confirmed BioHAP's enhanced mineral deposition and dentinal tubular occlusion, demonstrating superior structural repair capabilities. These findings advance restorative dentistry by establishing BioHAP as the optimal commercial agent for root dentin remineralisation and hypersensitivity management.

Indexed as

biomimetic hydroxyapatite (BioHAP)casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate (CPP-ACP)enamelonremineralisationRoot dentin

Identifiers

PMID42145379
PMCPMC13177080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.