ArticleBioinformation2026
Comparative outcomes of central versus lateral lip-split access in head and neck reconstructive surgery following tumor resection.
Article in Bioinformation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Optimal incision design for lip-split mandibulotomy in advanced head and neck tumor resection remains controversial, as postoperative functional impairment and aesthetic morbidity continue to affect long-term quality-of-life despite adequate oncologic clearance. Therefore, it is of interest to compare lateral and central access via the lips of patients undergoing multi-tumoral resection as well as microvascular reconstruct. The lateral lip-split approach showed less injuries and better postoperative oral performance, whereas central lip-split access was slightly shorter exposure times to the operation. Both options are safe but lateral lip-split access has superior aesthetic and functional results. The choice of an incision's design must consider oncologic access as well as the long-term quality of life outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.