ArticleBioinformation2026
Artificial intelligence improves radiologist workflow and assessment of image quality accuracy.
Article in Bioinformation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Increasing imaging volumes and workflow pressures make consistent image quality assessment (IQA) challenging for radiologists in routine clinical practice. Artificial intelligence (AI) systems have recently been introduced to support quality control tasks, yet real-world evidence on their impact on radiologist workflow and diagnostic performance remains limited. Therefore, it is of interest to assess the effect of AI-IQA module of PACS/worklist on radiological workflow and accuracy in identifying suboptimal CT/MRI tests. Workflow (IQA time, TTFR and TAT) and IQA performance (sensitivity, specificity, kappa) metrics were evaluated in two groups (before and after 8 weeks of AI integration) and compared to an expert reference standard. AI integration lowered median IQA task time/examination and improved report turnaround time and improved radiologist sensitivity to suboptimal IQA without affecting specificity. Thus, we show AI-assisted IQA as a scalable tool to enhance the quality control and operation performance in the routine clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.