ArticleBioinformation2026
No-preparation and conventional veneers in esthetic dentistry: Clinical considerations.
Article in Bioinformation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The choice between no-preparation and conventional porcelain veneers remains a clinical challenge due to the differences in clinical longevity, esthetic outcomes and preservation of tooth structure. Therefore, it is of interest to compare no-preparation porcelain veneers with conventional porcelain veneers to support clinical decision-making. Evidence from peer-reviewed studies demonstrates favorable short- to mid-term survival of no-preparation veneers. Success rates reach up to 97.4% when bonded to enamel in well-selected cases. The advantages of no-preparation veneers include enamel preservation, reduced postoperative sensitivity and have a low biological cost. However, they are not recommended for cases with intrinsic discoloration, misalignment, or significant morphological discrepancies. Conventional veneers remain dependable for complex esthetic corrections; however, they require greater tooth reduction and carry a higher biological risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.