ArticleDigital health
Integrating machine learning and experimental design to analyze unstructured healthcare decisions: A mixed-methods study at Kawsar Hospital.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study investigates decision-making processes among healthcare managers at Kawsar Hospital in Sanandaj, Iran, using a mixed-methods approach that integrates qualitative insights with data-driven analysis. Methods: Semistructured interviews with 15 managers were analyzed through the Critical Incident Technique and the NatCen Framework, revealing distinct patterns in unstructured, multilevel decisions. Results: Organizational knowledge played a central role in the initial stages of decision making, while external research became more influential in later phases. A dataset derived from these interviews was examined using Random Forest and K-means clustering. The machine learning results highlighted time pressure as the most influential predictor of decision quality, whereas managerial experience contributed only marginally. Clustering analysis further revealed heterogeneous managerial profiles, reflecting differences in experience, decision speed, and contextual stressors. Additionally, Response Surface Methodology (DOE/RSM) underscored the importance of information sources in optimizing decisions under uncertainty. All participants expressed satisfaction with their decisions, emphasizing the adaptive and naturalistic nature of their decision-making styles. Conclusion: These findings, while exploratory given the limited sample size, provide a practical framework for enhancing healthcare management by integrating qualitative evidence with machine learning and experimental design. Future studies with larger datasets and expanded coding (e.g. a decision types table) are recommended to strengthen the generalizability and applications of this research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.