Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42145270›Full record

ArticleAssessment2026

Effects of Ecological Momentary Assessment Prompting Schedule on Affect Measurement Variability and Associations With Next-Day Health Behaviors.

Jeremy S Langford, Emily T Hébert, Dusti R Jones, Sarah S Tonkin, Blayne A Barker, Clayton Ulm, Dingjing Shi, Jessica A Becerra, Michael Businelle

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Assessment, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jeremy S LangfordThe University of Oklahoma Health Campus, Oklahoma City, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1057-4716
Emily T HébertThe University of Oklahoma Health Campus, Oklahoma City, USA.
Dusti R JonesThe University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9060-7046
Sarah S TonkinThe University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, USA.
Blayne A BarkerThe University of Oklahoma Health Campus, Oklahoma City, USA.
Clayton UlmThe University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4564-1138
Dingjing ShiGeorgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, USA.
Jessica A BecerraEdgility Talent Partners, Spofford, USA.
Michael BusinelleThe University of Oklahoma Health Campus, Oklahoma City, USA.

Funding

Tissue Pathology Shared ResourceP30CA225520 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA HLTH SCIENCES CTR · PI James F Papin · 2018 to 2026
$27.1M
CTSA K12 Program at University of Utah: Early Career Faculty Development ProgramK12TR004413 · NCATS · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI MAUREEN A MURTAUGH, Corrine Ione Voils · 2023 to 2026
$3.9M
Using Machine Learning to Develop Just-in-Time Adaptive Interventions for Smoking CessationR00DA046564 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI HEBERT, EMILY TAYLOR · 2021 to 2023
$747k
NCATS NIH HHS K12 TR004413NCI NIH HHS P30 CA225520NIDA NIH HHS R00 DA046564
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ecological momentary assessments (EMAs) effectively measure dynamic changes in constructs such as affect. Accurate assessment of affect variability may depend on study design characteristics. While EMAs delivered at random intervals are typically considered superior for capturing variability compared to EMAs delivered at set timepoints, there have been few experimental comparisons of these assessment methodologies. The present study used data from a nationwide factorial experiment to identify best practices in EMA methods. Participants (

Indexed as

affect variabilityambulatory assessmentecological momentary assessmenthealth behaviorsmHealthself-reportsmartphone

Identifiers

PMID42145270
PMCPMC13499950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.