ReviewEuropace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology2026
Sensor detection and pacing for impending reflex syncope.
Review in Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsReflex syncope occurs infrequently but may benefit from pacing intervention. However, reflex syncope poses special problems for successful cardiac pacing. Between episodes, monitoring by the implanted device is required to provide warning of an impending syncope and initiate pacing therapy if appropriate. This article aims to review available devices and their function in different forms of reflex syncope. METHODS AND
resultsThe first device dedicated to address detection of VVS was the Rate Drop Response (RDR) (Medtronic Inc., MN, USA). It used a modified rate hysteresis approach to detect falls in heart rate that are faster than physiological but slower than those in cardiac conduction tissue disease. Since the introduction of RDR more has been learnt about the development of vasodepression and cardiac inhibition in vasovagal syncope (VVS). Detection of vasodepression, which occurs substantially earlier than cardioinhibition, assumes great importance. Currently, such detection is only offered by the Closed Loop System (CLS) (Biotronik GmbH, Berlin, Germany). Carotid sinus syndrome (CSS) shows different haemodynamic features from VVS with early vasodepression absent which demands rethinking of device selection and programming. RDR yielded improved management of both VVS and CSS. CLS has demonstrated clear benefits in two important recent randomized controlled VVS pacing trials. So far, no comparative trial between RDR and CLS has been undertaken.
conclusionPacing the bradycardia of reflex syncope requires a full appreciation of its haemodynamic events, including timing of vasodepression and cardioinhibition requiring sophisticated detection and therapy delivery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.