ArticleEuropean journal of sport science2026
Tracking Performance Limits Using Multi-Timescale Maximal Mean Power Ratios.
Article in European journal of sport science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study introduces a multi-timescale mechanical model to quantify proximity to performance limits during endurance exercise. The model represents power output using a set of rolling averages, each associated with a characteristic time constant, and identifies the dominant component as the one approaching its historical maximum at any given time. To demonstrate this framework, real-world data were collected from 21 male professional cyclists during an 11-day training camp. Data from the first 10 days were used to construct individual maximal mean power (MMP) profiles across multiple time scales. On the final day, cyclists completed a fatiguing protocol (∼2000 kJ of work) followed by 3-min and 12-min maximal time trials. During exercise, the ratio between each exponentially weighted component and its corresponding historical maximum was computed, and the maximum ratio was used to track proximity to performance limits. At the end of the time trials, this ratio reached 98.6% (94.3%-101%) and 101% (98.5%-103%) for the 3-min and 12-min efforts, respectively (median and interquartile range), indicating convergence toward maximal performance capacity. Notably, in both trials the dominant component corresponded to a slower time scale (∼1 h), rather than to components matching the nominal duration of the efforts. These findings suggest that performance limits emerge from the interaction of multiple time scales and are not solely dictated by the duration or intensity of the task. This framework extends the traditional use of MMP from a post hoc descriptive tool to a real-time dynamical measure of performance capacity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.