ArticleThe British journal of nutrition2026
From single conventional regression to ensemble modelling: relative importance of the Healthy Eating Index-2015 components in relation to adverse pregnancy outcomes.
Julie M Petersen, Lisa M Bodnar, Ashley I Naimi, Sharon I Kirkpatrick
Abstract read
In one paragraphArticle in The British journal of nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registryThe trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literatureWho cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
4 · The recordCorrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what moneyAuthors and funding
4 authors.
Lisa M BodnarEpidemiology, https://ror.org/01an3r305University of Pittsburgh School of Public Health, USA.
Ashley I NaimiEpidemiology, Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, USA.
Funding
Indiana Clinical and Translational Sciences InstituteUL1TR001108 · NCATS · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI DENNE, SCOTT C., SHEKHAR, ANANTHA · 2013 to 2017
$23.3MPreterm Birth in Nulliparous Women: An Understudied Population at Great RiskU10HD063036 · NICHD · RESEARCH TRIANGLE INSTITUTE · PI PARKER, CORETTE BREEDEN · 2010 to 2015
$19.5MInstitute for Clinical and Translational ScienceUL1TR000153 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI COOPER, DAN M · 2012 to 2015
$12.1MInforming national guidelines on diet patterns that promote healthy pregnancy outcomesR01HD102313 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI BODNAR, LISA M, NAIMI, ASHLEY ISAAC · 2020 to 2024
$3.0MPrevention of Preterm Birth in high Risk Nulliparous PatientsU10HD063047 · NICHD · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI WAPNER, RONALD · 2010 to 2014
$1.9MPreterm Birth in Nulliparous Women: An Understudied Population at Great RiskU10HD063053 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI SILVER, ROBERT M. · 2010 to 2014
$1.7MPreterm Birth in Nulliparous Women: An Understudied Population at Great Risk U10HD063020 · NICHD · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI GROBMAN, WILLIAM ADAM · 2010 to 2014
$1.6MPreterm Birth in Nulliparous Women: An Understudied Population at Great RiskU10HD063046 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI WING, DEBORAH A · 2010 to 2014
$1.6MPreterm Birth in Nulliparous Women: An Understudied Population at Great RiskU10HD063041 · NICHD · MAGEE-WOMEN'S RES INST AND FOUNDATION · PI SIMHAN, HYAGRIV N · 2010 to 2014
$1.5MPreterm Birth in Nulliparous Women: An Understudied Population at Great RiskU10HD063048 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI PARRY, SAMUEL I. · 2010 to 2014
$1.5MDissecting the Genetic Etiology of Preterm Birth in Nulliparous WomenU10HD063037 · NICHD · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI HAAS, DAVID M. · 2010 to 2014
$1.2MAdverse Outcomes in Nulliparous Pregnancies: The Ohio CollaborativeU10HD063072 · NICHD · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI MERCER, BRIAN M. · 2010 to 2014
$1.2MNCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000153NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001108NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD102313NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD063020NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD063036NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD063037NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD063041NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD063046NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD063047NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD063048NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD063053NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD063072
6 · The paper itselfAbstract
The Healthy Eating Index (HEI) is widely used to assess diet quality, but certain contexts (e.g. pregnancy) may benefit from tailored versions. We evaluated whether the HEI's current approach of assigning approximately equal weights to all components to compute the total score is appropriate when studying diet quality around conception. Data were from a US prospective cohort of individuals who had not delivered a previous pregnancy past 20 weeks' gestation (2010-2013,
Indexed as
Diet qualityHealthy Eating IndexMachine learningPregnancyWeighting scheme
Identifiers
PMID42145204
PMCPMC13311460
What OpenQuestion holds
Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390