Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42145146›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2026

Assessing Unmet Social Needs in Multiple Sclerosis Care in Australia: A Qualitative Assessment of Feasibility, Barriers and Enablers.

Megan R Hawkins, Yvonne C Learmonth, Isabelle Weld-Blundell, Darshini Ayton, Jodi Haartsen, Anne Kavanagh, Tomas Kalincik, Marlena Klaic, Claudia H Marck

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Megan R HawkinsDisability and Health Unit, Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0009-0003-0474-930X
Yvonne C LearmonthSchool of Health Sciences, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4857-8480
Isabelle Weld-BlundellDisability and Health Unit, Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Darshini AytonSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2754-2024
Jodi HaartsenAlfred Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Anne KavanaghDisability and Health Unit, Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Tomas KalincikNeuroimmunology Centre, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3778-1376
Marlena KlaicMelbourne School of Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2328-0503
Claudia H MarckDisability and Health Unit, Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3173-1522

Funding

MS Australia 21-216MS Australia 21-3-053MS Australia 24-IGR1-0285NHMRC APP2035278
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnmet social needs (including housing, transport and social inclusion) contribute substantially to health outcomes, especially for people with long-term health conditions such as multiple sclerosis (MS). Whether assessment of unmet social needs occurs in MS clinical care is unclear. This study aims to (1) understand current practices, (2) identify barriers and enablers to social needs assessments in MS care, and (3) explore the feasibility of social needs screening tools.

methodsThis qualitative descriptive study comprised focus groups and interviews with clinicians, carers and people with MS in Australia. We inductively and deductively coded transcripts and used applied thematic analysis to identify themes, using COM-B (Capability, Opportunity, Motivation, Behaviour) and Feasibility frameworks.

resultsWe collected data from 19 participants (11 clinicians and 8 lived-experience participants). Participants reported inconsistent and unstructured social needs assessment in MS care. Barriers aligned with capability (lack of referral pathway knowledge), opportunity (resources) and motivation (belief in abilities, evidence of value and scepticism). Enablers aligned with capability (clinician rapport and self-advocacy), opportunity (care coordination and self-paced assessment), and motivation (mutual desire for positive patient outcomes). A social needs screening tool was considered acceptable, conditional on adequate resourcing and/or design to ensure identified needs can be addressed.

conclusionFindings from this qualitative descriptive study suggest that the current integration of social care in MS healthcare in Australia is inadequate. We identified opportunities to develop and test a screening tool and supporting referral resources to identify and address unmet social needs in MS patients. Better integrated social and healthcare represents a promising avenue for improving comprehensive MS management.

Indexed as

Health Services Needs and DemandMultiple SclerosisNeeds AssessmentSocial SupportAdultAustraliaCaregiversFeasibility StudiesFemaleFocus GroupsHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedQualitative Researchchronic diseasehealth inequalitiespatient‐centred caresocial determinants of healthsocial prescribingsocial support

Identifiers

PMID42145146
PMCPMC13181325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.