ArticleThe Journal of animal ecology2026
Predator-guild-specific parental responses mitigate higher predation risk on ground nests close to forest patches in a mosaic landscape.
Article in The Journal of animal ecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Predator-guild-specific parental responses mitigate higher predation risk on ground nests close to forest patches in a mosaic landscape.The Journal of animal ecology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The risk of nest predation differs across habitats and increases with proximity to habitat edges. In agricultural mosaic landscapes, the breeding success of ground-nesting birds can be negatively impacted by the presence of adjacent forest patches, which act as a source of predation. However, we still have limited knowledge on how birds nesting in such habitats cope with variable predation risk. In this study, we investigated predation rates of experimental ground nests and Northern Lapwing nests (Vanellus vanellus), in relation to the nearest patch. Furthermore, we tested the aggressive responses displayed by nesting pairs towards stuffed nest predators of different guilds at different distances from the forest. Predation rate on experimental nests increased with proximity and area of the closest forest patch. In contrast, predation rate on lapwing nests was not affected by the presence of forest, suggesting effective nest defence performed by parents to protect their clutch. Pairs displayed more aggressive behaviours against predators compared with a control wood log. Additionally, responses to specific predators varied with forest distance. Lapwings appeared more aggressive towards a bird when closer to forests, but were more aggressive towards a mammal further from forests. This study highlights the importance of fine-scale differences in anti-predatory behaviours to compensate for local variations in predation risk, in heterogeneous agricultural landscapes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.