Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42144959›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of experimental biology2026

Classifying behaviors from animal-borne cameras using machine learning: automated identification of breathing events in sea turtles.

Nathan J Robinson, Priyam Mazumdar, Brian F Allan, Jacopo Aguzzi, Brian Chen, Bing-Yuan Hsieh, Lola Millet, Jesus Tomás, Jeffrey Terstriep, Aiman Soliman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of experimental biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Nathan J RobinsonInstitut de Ciències del Mar, Spanish National Research Council - Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, 08003Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7384-3576
Priyam MazumdarNational Center for Supercomputing Applications, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL 61801, USA.
Brian F AllanNational Center for Supercomputing Applications, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL 61801, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1155-3271
Jacopo AguzziInstitut de Ciències del Mar, Spanish National Research Council - Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, 08003Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1484-8219
Brian ChenNational Center for Supercomputing Applications, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL 61801, USA.
Bing-Yuan HsiehNational Center for Supercomputing Applications, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL 61801, USA.
Lola MilletInstituto Cavanilles de Biodiversidad y Biología Evolutiva, University of Valencia, Apdo, 22085, 46071 Valencia, Spain.
Jesus TomásInstituto Cavanilles de Biodiversidad y Biología Evolutiva, University of Valencia, Apdo, 22085, 46071 Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0120-7006
Jeffrey TerstriepNational Center for Supercomputing Applications, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL 61801, USA.
Aiman SolimanNational Center for Supercomputing Applications, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL 61801, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2407-9668

Funding

Cape Eleuthera InstituteConsejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)EU DIGI4ECO 101112883-GAP-101112883National Center for Supercomputing ApplicationsNational Marine Fisheries Service NA16NMF0080003National Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationRamon y Cajal postdoctoral program #RYC2021-034381-IRamon y Cajal postdoctoral program RYC2021-034381-IUniversity of IllinoisWestern Connecticut State University
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animal-borne cameras are increasingly used to study animal behavior. Here, we assessed the utility of three machine-learning models - Resnet-50 (3 epochs), Resnet-50 (10 epochs) and Vision Transformer (ViT) (3 epochs) - for identifying breathing behavior from animal-borne camera footage from green turtles (Chelonia mydas). The ViT model had mean Accuracy (97.2%), Precision (63.3%) and F1 (72.7%) scores that outperformed the Resnet-50 models, while all models had a Recall of >99.9%. Thus, the ViT model correctly identified almost all breathing frames although false positives (apnea frames labeled as breathing) were relatively common and led to an over-estimation of breathing rates. We conclude that ViT models are a promising solution for behavioral classification of animal-borne camera footage and even if not yet capable of the fully automated calculation of breathing events in sea turtles, they can still massively reduce the quantity of footage that needs to be manually checked and labeled.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMachine LearningRespirationTurtlesVideo RecordingAnimalsClassification AlgorithmsArtificial intelligenceBehavioral classificationChelonia mydasDivingImage processingMachine learning

Identifiers

PMID42144959
PMCPMC13286345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.