SynthesisThe British journal of surgery2026
Interventions to reduce postoperative mortality in low- and middle-income countries: systematic review.
Synthesis in The British journal of surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPostoperative mortality is the third leading cause of death worldwide and disproportionately affects patients in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Although many deaths are potentially preventable, evidenced-based interventions remain limited. The aim of this systematic review was to consolidate randomized trial evidence on interventions designed to reduce postoperative mortality in LMICs.
methodsMedical databases from database inception to February 2025 were systematically searched for randomized trials evaluating interventions in any aspect of the patient pathway from admission to discharge that were designed to reduce postoperative mortality within 90 days of surgery in LMIC patients. Eligible studies included elective and emergency operations across all surgical specialties. The protocol was preregistered in PROSPERO, the international prospective register of systematic reviews (CRD42024604760).
resultsFrom 10 877 search results, some 18 trials involving 95 521 patients were included. Three were multicountry trials and half were conducted in China. Trials spanned multiple specialties, with only 4 of 18 assessed as having a low risk of bias. Four trials showed a significant reduction in mortality, although the interventions were largely context specific (two neurosurgical trials centred on operative technique in China, one Brazilian trial investigating patient blood management, and one study evaluating maternal death reviews and implementation of best practice after caesarean deliveries in Senegal and Mali). Adherence to interventions was generally high and similar between simple and complex interventions (93.6% versus 96.8% respectively), although adherence varied substantially across trials.
conclusionFew RCTs have targeted postoperative mortality in LMICs and no intervention demonstrated consistent effectiveness across multiple contexts. To maximize clinical impact, future research should prioritize the development of interventions in regions with the greatest need, particularly sub-Saharan Africa, and ensure they are co-developed with LMIC interest holders and evaluated across diverse clinical environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.