SynthesisGerodontology2026
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Global Prevalence of Dry Mouth in Older Adults.
Synthesis in Gerodontology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Staging in Gerodontology: A Framework.Gerodontology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe objective of this study is to update prevalence estimates for xerostomia and salivary gland hypofunction (SGH) among older adults through a systematic review and meta-analysis.
backgroundDry mouth is common among older adults but is inconsistently assessed and reported. Xerostomia and SGH represent distinct conditions with different diagnostic approaches, leading to heterogeneity in prevalence estimates. MATERIALS AND
methodsA systematic literature search of Medline (PubMed) and Web of Science was conducted from January 2018 to March 2025. This was supplemented by manual backward citation tracking of the foundational review to identify all eligible pre-2018 epidemiological studies. Only studies utilizing population-representative samples of adults aged 50 years and older with defined diagnostic criteria were included. Risk of bias was formally assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Tool for Prevalence Studies. Pooled prevalence estimates were calculated using random-effects meta-analyses. (PROSPERO: CRD420251009592).
resultsA total of 37 studies-encompassing over 1.6 million participants-met the inclusion criteria. The pooled global prevalence of xerostomia among older adults was 21% (95% CI: 19%-23%). For SGH, the pooled prevalence measured via UWS was 12% (95% CI: 4%-24%), whereas SWS yielded a prevalence of 13% (95% CI: 3%-28%). High heterogeneity was observed across all analyses. Differences in diagnostic thresholds and saliva collection methods contributed to the observed variability.
conclusionThis updated meta-analysis confirms that xerostomia affects around one-fifth of older adults, while SGH is less common, depending on the diagnostic criteria used. Future research should focus on improving diagnostic consistency and sample representativeness to enable more consistent and robust estimates, and thereby better guide prevention and care in geriatric oral health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.